Posts Tagged Banking and Finance

Federal Short Sale Program… The Last Resort?

5 Reasons Why The Program Is Doomed To Fail:

Like the federal loan modification program that was put into effect just over a year ago, the federally subsidized short sale program, set to take effect April 5th, is now being touted as the next great hope for homeowners who either can’t afford to, or are choosing not to, pay their mortgages.

But, just like the Making Home Affordable program that released last year with the promise of saving millions of homes, the federal short sale program is drastically flawed, and if enacted, will more than likely end up with the same exact outcome… after many months and billions of wasted taxpayer dollars, the “experts” will be that it isn’t working for a variety of reasons.

In this Nostradamus like post, we’re going to examine why this new program is doomed to fail… do us a favor – bookmark it, and in a year come back and revisit it, and see how many of these predictions come true. Without further adieu, here are 5 reasons why a federal short sale program won’t work:

1. Second (and third) mortgage holders

Here’s a potential scenario: You owe $500,000 on your home, which was purchased in 2005 with an 80/20 loan, meaning your first loan was for $400,000 (80%) and the second loan is for $100,000 (20%). Due to the collapse of the housing market, the home is now worth $300,000. You put it on the market for $300,000 and get an offer for $250,000, which you take to your first lender. Even if you jump through all their hoops, have a valid hardship, and get your short sale approved, that still leaves the second lender out in the cold, holding the bag to the tune of $100,000. The logical, and typical response from the second lender, will be to block the short sale any way they can.

2. Lack of buyers

Even in a perfect world where every lender agreed to take a loss and accept a short sale, there’s still one major flaw – we’re still in a recession, unemployment is at a multi-decade high and still rising, and consumer confidence is at an all time low. Add to that the fact that due to lack of liquidity and tightening of lending standards, many would be homebuyers are now ineligible for a mortgage anyway. Not exactly a formula for people rushing out to buy all these short sale properties, or to secure the funding to do so even if there were.

3. Bureaucracy & red tape by the banks

Have you ever tried to contact your bank for anything? Loan modification, find about or try to reverse a credit card fee, anything?

If so, you certainly know that it’s not the easiest task in the world. One department sends you over to another, who makes you repeat your info and your story. They tell you to fax in documents, then claim to never receive them. They say you’ll get a call back and you never do.

The point is that if the lender needs an excuse to postpone or make it  difficult for you to do anything, they have it… even if they have the best of intentions, the sheer volume of the requests for modifications, short sales, etc, has most lenders scrambling to play catch up.

Then there’s the fact that has squashed the hopes of so many short sellers in the past – even if you can get all the lenders and investors to agree on the short sale, that usually takes 3-6 months! By that time most qualified buyers have either found another home and lost interest in the current deal.

4. Lack of incentive & penalties

Just like the Federal Loan Modification program, this plan is lacking a huge ingredient… namely the lack of incentive for banks to take less than what they’re owed, and the lack of penalties for delaying or not complying with the rules of the program.

According to a NY Times article on Sunday, the program will offer $1000 apiece for 1st and 2nd mortgage holders, and $1500 for the seller.

Sure, there’s a $1,000 incentive payout for a bank to accept a short sale, that’s almost more of a slap in the face than anything. Actually, I’m kind of laughing out loud right now at the absurdity of this.  If someone owed you $100,000, and they came to you and said… “well I can only pay you $25,000, but  don’t worry, because my buddy here has another $1,000 for you…cool?” Haha… Does that really make anything better – it’s still only $26,000!!!

Or it looks more like this…

Borrower:  I know I owe you $100,000, but I can pay you $25,000… Is that ok?

Lender: No

Borrower: Ok, ok… well what if my friend uncle sam gives you $1,000 will that help?

Lender: Sure

I mean come on! Where do these smart people come up with these programs?

You really don’t need to incentivize the seller to sell – the fact that they are out of an underwater mortgage is incentive enough in most cases. The problem is, how can it possibly seem like a good idea for banks to take a $1000 consolation prize to take a loss of 5 or 6 figures on a deal?

Without a real, valuable incentive to accept short sale offers, and without a real penalty to lenders who don’t try to make things happen, there will be no real reason for lenders to go the extra mile to accept the short sales.

5. Lack of clear cut, uniform guidelines

Again, there is another huge comparison to be drawn with the federal loan modification program… the final decision is to be made at the sole discretion of the lender. One of the main reasons that the modification program failed is because you could submit the same application to 2 different lenders, or in some cases to 2 different people at the same lender, and receive 2 completely different answers.

Unless there is a uniform set of guidelines for acceptance, there is no way this will work.

Conclusion:

As with the loan modification program of a year ago, this program is destined for failure unless drastic changes are made to it by the government. By enacting these programs that are meant to be a show of the governments dedication to fixing the economy, but not including any real rules for banks to follow, they are delaying the inevitable, costing taxpayers billions more dollars, and making themselves look foolish and corrupt. Now is no time for token gestures, the economy is at the brink of collapse.

Either make changes that have some teeth and force the banks to start playing by some logical rules again, or do nothing, step back and let free market capitalism run its course. Let the market decide what the prices of homes should be, and who can qualify for them.

Sure there will be bank failures, foreclosures, and more pain, but most people who have an understanding of the economy, a few ounces of logic in their head, and don’t have a bank lobbyist at their doorstep daily, will tell you that this is bound to happen anyway. So isn’t it better to “rip the band aid off quickly”? Either let things take their course naturally, or to really take some action to change that course, instead of doing everything and anything, at all costs (literally) to keep playing by the bank’s rules, and stay on the same crash course that we’re currently on?

And then there’s the issue of the millions of people who are facing foreclosure. If they have tried everything possible to get a short sale done – jumped through all their banks hoops, found a buyer, did all the proper negotiation with all involved parties, and the banks still said no… then shouldn’t those people have the right to give the bank their home back with the same ramifications as if they did a short sale? It just seems very illogical to penalize a seller for circumstances that are far beyond their control, and very unproductive… why not penalize the banks who drag their feet and lose deals instead? You’d at least get some more short sales closed.

New York Times Reported on March 7, 2010:

But at the end of the day, the banks would rather make things difficult. According to J. K. Huey, a Wells Fargo vice president, said a short sale, like a loan modification, would have to meet the requirements of the investor who owns the loan.

“This is not an opportunity for the customer to just walk away,” Ms. Huey said. “If someone doesn’t come to us saying, ‘I’ve done everything I can, I used all my savings, I borrowed money and, by the way, I’m losing my job and moving to another city, and have all the documentation,’ we’re not going to do a short sale.”

Please comment below and let us know why you think this new program either will or won’t work. Thanks!

Related posts:

  1. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for lenders…
  2. Wachovia Short Sales Made Easy Jennifer Kelly with Wachovia Bank visited our Keller Williams Realty – Elk Grove office meeting today and gave us some…
  3. Obama’s Housing Shell Game; Short Sales and Relocation Assistance We’ve now come full circle. Instead of trying to get people to stay in their homes, Obama is willing to…

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Banks finally seeing short sales as cheaper than foreclosures

For a few months now I’ve been hearing rumblings that many of the non-foreclosure sales out there are actually short sales since lenders have, after needlessly losing more money than necessary to the (old-fashioned) foreclosure process, realized that short sales are faster, easier and prevent angry borrowers from trashing the place when they leave.

So what took them so long? Well, I can only speak from personal experience, but my very first job out of college was for a mortgage company that was associated with a (now-defunct) S&L, and rocket scientists they weren’t. From an L.A. Times story:

In a short sale the lender lets a homeowner unload a house for less than what is owed on the mortgage. The transaction recognizes that the home isn’t worth what the owner paid for it after more than two years of falling real estate values.

Such deals are appealing to struggling homeowners because they escape weighty house debts — but they don’t get away unscathed. Their credit scores will be damaged, perhaps less severely than in foreclosure, but still badly enough to limit for years their ability to borrow money. There may be tax consequences. And any money invested through down payments and renovations will be lost.

Lenders, which can withhold approval of a short sale if they don’t like the price, have resisted such sales because they are difficult to execute, particularly when multiple creditors and other parties are involved. And short sales lock in losses that might be reduced if the sale is delayed until the market improves.

But that resistance is softening. With more Americans losing jobs and missing mortgage payments, banks and investors increasingly are agreeing to short sales as a less costly alternative to foreclosure…

Short sales are still few compared with foreclosures, but policymakers are looking at such sales to shrink the number of bank-owned homes on the market.

Late last year, the Obama administration added incentives to get short sales done if a borrower is unable to qualify for a modified mortgage as part of the government’s $75-billion effort to help troubled homeowners. Starting in April, the government will pay incentives to lenders and borrowers when a sale is completed.

Many economists view short sales as a way to address a problem that mortgage relief hasn’t fixed: properties that are “under water,” carrying more debt than the home is worth….

Short sales remain difficult. Uncertainty over home prices makes properties hard to value, lenders are understaffed (apparently hiring more people at a time of record unemployment in the mortgage industry is too scary and difficult to address – ed.) and multiple loans on a home can trip up negotiations among creditors…

One factor motivating banks to go along with short sales is that foreclosures typically cost more. Foreclosed properties often sit vacant, susceptible to damage from neglect or vandals. A study by Amherst Securities Group found that prime loans took an average loss of 45% in a foreclosure as opposed to 35% in a short sale (why didn’t the lenders themselves do such an analysis since they’ve got the data? – Ed.)…

Then there’s the problem of second mortgages, which have proved to be a thorny impediment to the housing recovery. The loans were widespread during the boom years as people tapped rising equity or financed a down payment.

Of the 1.2 million U.S. properties in foreclosure, about 34%, or 403,670, have a second loan, according to RealtyTrac. In California, with 280,023 properties in foreclosure, about 46%, or 128,800, have a second loan.

Google Buzz

Related posts:

  1. One in Four Borrowers Is Underwater From the wall street journal, 11-24-09, by Ruth Simon and James R. Hagerty The proportion of U.S. homeowners who owe…
  2. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for lenders…
  3. Why Short Sales Are Not So Short A term that is becoming more popular in the real estate world is “Short Sales”. Short sales usually apply to…

Tags: , ,

Citibank’s Foreclosure Alternatives Program is a Trap

MousetrapToday Citibank announced its “Foreclosure Alternatives Program,” which has a goal (according to Citi) “to help homeowners make a smooth transition into the next chapter of their lives.”

That’s a nice way to describe a program that’s designed to trap homeowners into paying for utilities, HOA dues, and ongoing maintenance expenses.  This can easily cost homeowners thousands of dollars throughout the lengthy foreclosure process. Their reward? $1,000 of relocation money that they were going to get anyway.

From MarketWatch:

In exchange for the deed on their property, CitiMortgage will allow borrowers to stay in their homes for a period of up to six months. At the end of the six months, the borrower will turn over the property deed to CitiMortgage, and CitiMortgage will provide a minimum of $1,000 in relocation assistance to the borrowers. Citi will also provide relocation counseling by trained professionals and will cover certain monthly property expenses if Citi determines that the borrower can no longer afford them. Payment of utilities costs will be the responsibility of the borrower. Other costs incurred by the borrower, such as homeowner’s association and escrow fees, will be determined on a case-by-case basis considering the borrower’s specific financial circumstances. As part of the agreement, borrowers must maintain the property in its current condition and agree to bi-monthly meetings during which trained relocation professionals will help the borrower prepare for the next chapter of their lives.

Before a borrower enters the Foreclosure Alternatives Program, they must first be evaluated for a permanent mortgage modification. For those who do not qualify for a modification or another solution, CitiMortgage will explore the possibility of a short sale in which the company might accept a buyer’s offer for less than the outstanding amount of the mortgage. If a short sale is not feasible, then the borrower may be considered for the deed-in-lieu program. In addition, in order to be eligible, homeowners must hold first mortgages with a clear title owned by CitiMortgage, occupy the property, and be at least 90 days delinquent on their mortgage payments.

This program does nothing to help homeowners. The modify-short-sale-foreclose process is basically the same that homeowners go through anyway.

Here, Citi is asking homeowners to sign a contract that they will continue to pay for utilities, HOA dues, and all property maintenance all the way through the process. Considering that trial modifications and failed short sales could easily cover six months each, the homeowner could easily be on the hook for 1-2 years worth of costs that they could have simply walked away from.

Plus possibly six months more? When exactly does the six months start?

And what happens if the homeowner can’t keep up the property or misses an HOA payment? Can the bank then come after them for that money? It’s a pretty safe bet that the fine print in this Program contract could only open the homeowner up to more future liabilities.

Why would any homeowner agree to something like this? For the $1,000? They’d get that anyway as cash-for-keys. For the Deed-In-Lieu instead of a foreclosure?  Many banks will allow that option without any additional contract.

This is nothing more than a way for Citi to trap homeowners into paying for upkeep, utilities, and HOA dues that the bank would otherwise have to pay.

Related posts:

  1. One Giant Leap For Short Sales The Treasury Department has laid out new industry guidelines for processing short sales that will drastically improve the process by:…
  2. Citigroup to Postpone Foreclosures for the Holidays This happens every year with just about every bank. I’m actually surprised we’ve made it this far into December without…
  3. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for lenders…

Tags: , , , , , ,

My week in Indian Wells at the C.A.R. Business Meetings…

Have I mentioned lately that I really love being a Realtor? I love working with my buyer and seller clients, and I also really enjoy my involvement on the other side of things…I mention pretty frequently my involvement in various committees locally at the Sacramento Association of Realtors. I am also an active participant in various committees at the state level. So, if you follow me on Facebook or Twitter, you will already know that I left town early this week and flew to Palm Springs in order to attend the winter business meetings for the California Association of Realtors.

It was definitely a working trip! In addition to attending my committee meetings and other related events, I still obviously had to work…I still did short sale negotiation, actually closed a short sale on Thursday.

The C.A.R. Board of Directors and its Committees research and formulate policy on all areas affecting the business, professional practices and public policy involvement of California Realtors. I am on 4 C.A.R. committees. The am a member of the Membership Committee, the Local Government Relations Forum, and the Communications Advisory Committee, and I have a leadership position on the Young Professionals Network Committee. Most of the sessions are closed, so I can not go into too much detail regarding the content of what was discussed…

The journey home was quite an experience…the Palm Springs airport was basically shut down due to bad weather. My flight was cancelled and I was basically stranded. Thankfully, one of my Realtor colleagues took pity on me, and turned around 3o minutes into the drive home and rescued me. I finally got home around midnight last night, after I should have been home around noon. UGH.

Anyway, back to work this week! I have a great (non-short sale) listing coming on the market on Wednesday, and all kinds of other great things going on…

Related posts:

  1. Fannie Mae Short Sales – Trustee Sales may no longer be postponed! I received an alarming email yesterday from my favorite Escrow officer…she forwarded me a memo from their legal department: “One…
  2. Thinking about listing your short sale with Uncle Bob? Proceed with caution… If you follow me on Facebook or Twitter, you will already know that I am experiencing a little frustration regarding…
  3. Nice way to start 2010!…with an award! Today I attended the Officers & Directors Installation Luncheon at the Sacramento Association of Realtors. Our new President for…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,