Posts Tagged Everything About Foreclosures

Federal Short Sale Program… The Last Resort?

5 Reasons Why The Program Is Doomed To Fail:

Like the federal loan modification program that was put into effect just over a year ago, the federally subsidized short sale program, set to take effect April 5th, is now being touted as the next great hope for homeowners who either can’t afford to, or are choosing not to, pay their mortgages.

But, just like the Making Home Affordable program that released last year with the promise of saving millions of homes, the federal short sale program is drastically flawed, and if enacted, will more than likely end up with the same exact outcome… after many months and billions of wasted taxpayer dollars, the “experts” will be that it isn’t working for a variety of reasons.

In this Nostradamus like post, we’re going to examine why this new program is doomed to fail… do us a favor – bookmark it, and in a year come back and revisit it, and see how many of these predictions come true. Without further adieu, here are 5 reasons why a federal short sale program won’t work:

1. Second (and third) mortgage holders

Here’s a potential scenario: You owe $500,000 on your home, which was purchased in 2005 with an 80/20 loan, meaning your first loan was for $400,000 (80%) and the second loan is for $100,000 (20%). Due to the collapse of the housing market, the home is now worth $300,000. You put it on the market for $300,000 and get an offer for $250,000, which you take to your first lender. Even if you jump through all their hoops, have a valid hardship, and get your short sale approved, that still leaves the second lender out in the cold, holding the bag to the tune of $100,000. The logical, and typical response from the second lender, will be to block the short sale any way they can.

2. Lack of buyers

Even in a perfect world where every lender agreed to take a loss and accept a short sale, there’s still one major flaw – we’re still in a recession, unemployment is at a multi-decade high and still rising, and consumer confidence is at an all time low. Add to that the fact that due to lack of liquidity and tightening of lending standards, many would be homebuyers are now ineligible for a mortgage anyway. Not exactly a formula for people rushing out to buy all these short sale properties, or to secure the funding to do so even if there were.

3. Bureaucracy & red tape by the banks

Have you ever tried to contact your bank for anything? Loan modification, find about or try to reverse a credit card fee, anything?

If so, you certainly know that it’s not the easiest task in the world. One department sends you over to another, who makes you repeat your info and your story. They tell you to fax in documents, then claim to never receive them. They say you’ll get a call back and you never do.

The point is that if the lender needs an excuse to postpone or make it  difficult for you to do anything, they have it… even if they have the best of intentions, the sheer volume of the requests for modifications, short sales, etc, has most lenders scrambling to play catch up.

Then there’s the fact that has squashed the hopes of so many short sellers in the past – even if you can get all the lenders and investors to agree on the short sale, that usually takes 3-6 months! By that time most qualified buyers have either found another home and lost interest in the current deal.

4. Lack of incentive & penalties

Just like the Federal Loan Modification program, this plan is lacking a huge ingredient… namely the lack of incentive for banks to take less than what they’re owed, and the lack of penalties for delaying or not complying with the rules of the program.

According to a NY Times article on Sunday, the program will offer $1000 apiece for 1st and 2nd mortgage holders, and $1500 for the seller.

Sure, there’s a $1,000 incentive payout for a bank to accept a short sale, that’s almost more of a slap in the face than anything. Actually, I’m kind of laughing out loud right now at the absurdity of this.  If someone owed you $100,000, and they came to you and said… “well I can only pay you $25,000, but  don’t worry, because my buddy here has another $1,000 for you…cool?” Haha… Does that really make anything better – it’s still only $26,000!!!

Or it looks more like this…

Borrower:  I know I owe you $100,000, but I can pay you $25,000… Is that ok?

Lender: No

Borrower: Ok, ok… well what if my friend uncle sam gives you $1,000 will that help?

Lender: Sure

I mean come on! Where do these smart people come up with these programs?

You really don’t need to incentivize the seller to sell – the fact that they are out of an underwater mortgage is incentive enough in most cases. The problem is, how can it possibly seem like a good idea for banks to take a $1000 consolation prize to take a loss of 5 or 6 figures on a deal?

Without a real, valuable incentive to accept short sale offers, and without a real penalty to lenders who don’t try to make things happen, there will be no real reason for lenders to go the extra mile to accept the short sales.

5. Lack of clear cut, uniform guidelines

Again, there is another huge comparison to be drawn with the federal loan modification program… the final decision is to be made at the sole discretion of the lender. One of the main reasons that the modification program failed is because you could submit the same application to 2 different lenders, or in some cases to 2 different people at the same lender, and receive 2 completely different answers.

Unless there is a uniform set of guidelines for acceptance, there is no way this will work.

Conclusion:

As with the loan modification program of a year ago, this program is destined for failure unless drastic changes are made to it by the government. By enacting these programs that are meant to be a show of the governments dedication to fixing the economy, but not including any real rules for banks to follow, they are delaying the inevitable, costing taxpayers billions more dollars, and making themselves look foolish and corrupt. Now is no time for token gestures, the economy is at the brink of collapse.

Either make changes that have some teeth and force the banks to start playing by some logical rules again, or do nothing, step back and let free market capitalism run its course. Let the market decide what the prices of homes should be, and who can qualify for them.

Sure there will be bank failures, foreclosures, and more pain, but most people who have an understanding of the economy, a few ounces of logic in their head, and don’t have a bank lobbyist at their doorstep daily, will tell you that this is bound to happen anyway. So isn’t it better to “rip the band aid off quickly”? Either let things take their course naturally, or to really take some action to change that course, instead of doing everything and anything, at all costs (literally) to keep playing by the bank’s rules, and stay on the same crash course that we’re currently on?

And then there’s the issue of the millions of people who are facing foreclosure. If they have tried everything possible to get a short sale done – jumped through all their banks hoops, found a buyer, did all the proper negotiation with all involved parties, and the banks still said no… then shouldn’t those people have the right to give the bank their home back with the same ramifications as if they did a short sale? It just seems very illogical to penalize a seller for circumstances that are far beyond their control, and very unproductive… why not penalize the banks who drag their feet and lose deals instead? You’d at least get some more short sales closed.

New York Times Reported on March 7, 2010:

But at the end of the day, the banks would rather make things difficult. According to J. K. Huey, a Wells Fargo vice president, said a short sale, like a loan modification, would have to meet the requirements of the investor who owns the loan.

“This is not an opportunity for the customer to just walk away,” Ms. Huey said. “If someone doesn’t come to us saying, ‘I’ve done everything I can, I used all my savings, I borrowed money and, by the way, I’m losing my job and moving to another city, and have all the documentation,’ we’re not going to do a short sale.”

Please comment below and let us know why you think this new program either will or won’t work. Thanks!

Related posts:

  1. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for lenders…
  2. Wachovia Short Sales Made Easy Jennifer Kelly with Wachovia Bank visited our Keller Williams Realty – Elk Grove office meeting today and gave us some…
  3. Obama’s Housing Shell Game; Short Sales and Relocation Assistance We’ve now come full circle. Instead of trying to get people to stay in their homes, Obama is willing to…

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Selling Short might get another advantage

When a homeowner sells their property “short,”  that amount of money that was forgiven by the lender is considered income and typically taxed.   Well, currently the Federal Government is not taxing that money to the short seller but the state of California is.  On Monday, Legislation to prevent the state from taxing forgiven mortgage debt cleared the state Assembly.  The legislation could potentially offer tax relief to thousands of Californians who sold their home through short sale in 2009.  The measure passed 47-27 and is now being sent to Governor Schwarzenegger.

Schwarzenegger’s office signaled later that he may veto the measure. 

Currently, the fed’s tax relief is in place through 2012.  California was forgiving the “income” in 2007 and 2008 but since falling on major budget deficits, the state has since been taxing the amount of money the seller/homeowner was forgiven.

Doug’s take: I can definitely see both sides of this one.  It is a huge help for struggling homeowners that have to sell short to get the tax break.  I know, i have many short sale clients currently and in the past.  They all tell me how tough it is going to be to pay that tax on the forgiven amount.  It would be a much needed break for those in the difficult position of losing their home and have to do a short sale.

On the other hand, the state is in financial ruin as well.  The state needs all the tax money it can get.  We’ve all been effected by the deficit.

My suggestion is meeting in the middle and only taxing half as much as would normally be taxed.  It would be a win-win in my opinion but then again politics are not that easy.  We’ll just have to wait and see how it plays out.  I know my past short sale clients will be anxiously waiting.

If you have any questions about selling your home as a short sale, i’m here to help.  Give me a call or email and i’ll put my short sale experience to work for you.

clear skies,

doug reynolds

Related posts:

  1. California Legislature to Vote Monday on Taxing Forgiven Mortgage Debt For thousands of Californians who did a short sale or had mortgage debt forgiven via a modification in 2009, Monday…
  2. The Coming Tax Nightmare Over Forgiven Mortgage Debt in California Do you think homedebtors are ready for their California tax bill on forgiven debt? That HELOC will get them. …
  3. Expounding on short sale fraud…… fraud,short sale, recourse, loan,nonrecourse,california, single action,attorney,real estate tax…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

How Do Employers Look At My Credit? Can Foreclosure Affect My Employment?

Today on CNN they talked about these VERY interesting statistics.

Here are the highlights below:    (full transcript)

security_clearnace_cardVELSHI: And one that we’ve had in the last couple ideas has been this — this idea that there are states or efforts to try and curtail the use of your credit report, your credit history by employers to make a determination as to whether or not you should get a job. But it is a widespread practice.

ROMANS: It really is, and I think most people don’t even understand this. Eighteen states — 25 different bills in 18 states in this legislative calendar, Ali, are trying to limit what your prospective employer can see about you.

A job applicant goes and applies for the job. Human resources or the owner of that business can run a credit check as long as they tell you. Sixty percent of companies do this; 13 percent do everybody as a standard practice.

VELSHI: Wow.

ROMANS: They just run a credit check on everybody. Forty-seven percent just do for selected candidates. Most likely, Ali, people who are going to be touching money, who are going to be running a budget.

VELSHI: Right.

ROMANS: Forty percent of companies just don’t do this at all. They simply don’t run a credit history. But it can be done, and it is legal.

VELSHI: You mentioned something. It’s legal if they ask you and you consent. When you’re in a job market that we’re in now, most prospective employees, people looking for a job, don’t think that they have the right or don’t think it would be wise to say no.

ROMANS: Right. And look, if you’re — if you’re going for a job in a money business, it’s pretty standard. Also, if you’re going for a job in some things that are licensed like day cares or in different states. There are different kinds of jobs you have to have a license, where they have to do a criminal and a credit check on you just to know who you are if you’re dealing with the elderly or you’re dealing with young people.

So, all of your information…

VELSHI: Yes.

ROMANS: You should assume all of your information is available to the person who is thinking about hiring you.

VELSHI: You did some research into what you are most likely not to get hired for as a result of somebody checking your credit.

ROMANS: Yes. OK, so this is a — this is from the Society for Human Resources Management. So, this is a human resources firm. Look, you’re not going to get hired because of a current judgment against you, a lawsuit, an outstanding order against you in the court of law; debt collection, uncollected debt, you’ve got a lot of debt out there. Bankruptcy, 25 percent of the hiring managers would look you over because of a bankruptcy. High debt-to-income ratio, much less and foreclosure (which is only 11%), even less than that.

Other Experts Chime In

MSN.com reported this recently.  I talked about this in my recent blog “Credit Scores Heal, Your Savings Account Won’t!”

Some employment experts say concern about credit checks is overblown. For one thing, they say, companies typically are far more interested in other kinds of background checks, including identity verification and criminal histories. (For more information on background screening, see “Secrets a background check won’t uncover.”)

Job applicants are much more likely to lose jobs because they have a recent criminal history or they lied on an application about their identity, experience or education, said William Greenblatt, the CEO of Sterling Infosystems, a New York City background-checking firm.

Employers are more likely to use credit reports as a way to verify employment history and Social Security numbers, Greenblatt said. Lenders often verify employment when you apply for a loan or credit card, so a credit report is seen as a good way to double-check the employers listed on a job seeker’s application.

Brad Veach, one of our advocates at www.YouWalkAway.com recently had a conversation with an officer in the military that actually makes decisions on peoples security clearances.  He said that “As long as the homeowner discloses to his superior officer (or boss) his mortgage challenges, the issues concerning security clearance and foreclosure (not bankruptcy) are typically overlooked.  They’re not that big of a deal.”   Bankruptcy is looked at as a bigger issue, due to the fact that it usually affects the entire credit picture.

To support this theory, If you can’t sell your home it doesn’t mean you are financially irresponsible.  It’s important to let your superiors know that you are doing something rather than nothing about the problem.  Many people who are in strategic default, are using their extra funds that are normally used for a mortgage payment to pay down other debts & keep themselves from financial ruin or bankruptcy.

In Conclusion

Don’t keep it a secret.  If  you presently have a security clearance and your employer finds out from someone else, it may create a problem that wasn’t really there.  Many people that make these employment decisions are facing similar problems with their own homes.  It may be much more favorable if you talk to them prior to making your decision to default.

Jon Maddux

CEO

www.YouWalkAway.com

Related posts:

  1. Credit Scores Heal, Your Savings Account Won’t! Fear of bad credit has homeowners paralyzed….
  2. Increased Unemployment in 43 States From The Bureau of Labor Statistics REGIONAL AND STATE EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT — DECEMBER 2009 Regional and state unemployment rates…
  3. California’s Unemployment Rate Decreases California’s Seasonally-Adjusted Unemployment Rate decreased in November to 12.3% From the Employment Development Department SACRAMENTO – California’s unemployment rate was…

Tags: , , , , ,

Home Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program « Logan Utah Real Estate Blog

There is another new Federal Government program out their designed to reduce the consequences and liability of people trying to avoid foreclosure by selling their homes as short sales, or else voluntarily giving up their homes with a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. This program is called the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program. Say that five times fast.

This program will be implemented on April 5th. It is supposed to “streamline” the short sale process, and remove the ability for banks to seek a deficiency judgement for the amounts they are actually owed from the borrowers. According to the official HMPadmin website:

The Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) Program provides additional options to avoid costly foreclosures and offers incentives to borrowers, servicers and investors who utilize a short sale or deed-in-lieu (DIL) to avoid foreclosures.

With either the HAFA short sale or DIL, the servicer may not require a cash contribution or promissory note from the borrower and must forfeit the ability to pursue a deficiency judgment against the borrower.

HAFA simplifies and streamlines the short sale and DIL process by providing a standard process flow, minimum performance timeframes and standard documentation.

While personally I think it is wrong for Government to relieve individuals of the responsibility of paying back debt they rightfully obtained, this should be a good thing for the housing market and real estate industry. Lengthy short sales are a huge problem with the way real estate works,  if that can somehow be shortened, real estate transactions will be far less complicated.

via Home Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program « Logan Utah Real Estate Blog.

Related posts:

  1. Citibank’s Foreclosure Alternatives Program is a Trap Today Citibank announced its “Foreclosure Alternatives Program,” which has a goal (according to Citi) “to help homeowners make a…
  2. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for…
  3. One Giant Leap For Short Sales The Treasury Department has laid out new industry guidelines for processing short sales that will drastically improve the process…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,