Posts Tagged Foreclosures

Elk Grove Short Sale Successes!

Elk Grove Short Sales

So much is written about how difficult Short Sales are, that I thought it was time I told you a bit about our successes with Elk Grove Short Sales

Just this past week –
We closed 2 Elk Grove short sale listings…the bank on both was Aurora Bank. These properties were investment properties for the seller and were listed the first part of November 2009. We received approvals on them by mid January 2010, which means about 70 days on each. Then we had 30 days to get them closed…which we did this week! One was sold to an investor and the other to a first time homebuyer! Both buyers are very happy that they hung in there for the 100 days it took to get these properties closed….not bad. In a normal market, the marketing period is often times 90 days on a home before it goes pending…these 2 took about 1 week to actually have buyers in contract on them!

In addition, this week, we closed an escrow for an investor client on an Elk Grove Short Sale and got 2 more buyers into escrow on Elk Grove short sale listings! Not a bad week for short sales in the Elk Grove area! With this being the year of the Short Sale , it is important that we all learn how to navigate through them. The process is getting easier…the banks are starting to get with it more…agents and buyers are getting more educated on the process.

If you are a buyer, watch for more information on the Top 10 things you need to know about Short Sales, coming in the next couple of days. And in the meantime make sure to read, First Time Home Buyers Buying Elk Grove Short Sales!.

If you are a homeowner in distress and want more information on Elk Grove Short Sales, make sure to check out www.ElkGroveShortSale.com or contact us at (916) 230-0371 for a FREE private consulation.

Search All Elk Grove homes here

Lori Mode, Keller Williams Realty – Elk Grove
www.AllElkGroveHomes.com
Lori@ModeandDurhaM.com
(916) 230-0371

Related posts:

  1. Elk Grove Short Sales – is this the Market of the Moment We all know that the market of the moment is Distressed Properties, but with the inventory decreasing in the Elk…
  2. Short Sale approvals – 3 approved in 1 day! It’s great to wake up in the morning and realize all of your hard work really does pay off! Yesterday…
  3. Elk Grove Short Sales – Important questions answered Millions of struggling homeowners face uncertainty and do not know where to turn or what to do next for their…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Federal Short Sale Program… The Last Resort?

5 Reasons Why The Program Is Doomed To Fail:

Like the federal loan modification program that was put into effect just over a year ago, the federally subsidized short sale program, set to take effect April 5th, is now being touted as the next great hope for homeowners who either can’t afford to, or are choosing not to, pay their mortgages.

But, just like the Making Home Affordable program that released last year with the promise of saving millions of homes, the federal short sale program is drastically flawed, and if enacted, will more than likely end up with the same exact outcome… after many months and billions of wasted taxpayer dollars, the “experts” will be that it isn’t working for a variety of reasons.

In this Nostradamus like post, we’re going to examine why this new program is doomed to fail… do us a favor – bookmark it, and in a year come back and revisit it, and see how many of these predictions come true. Without further adieu, here are 5 reasons why a federal short sale program won’t work:

1. Second (and third) mortgage holders

Here’s a potential scenario: You owe $500,000 on your home, which was purchased in 2005 with an 80/20 loan, meaning your first loan was for $400,000 (80%) and the second loan is for $100,000 (20%). Due to the collapse of the housing market, the home is now worth $300,000. You put it on the market for $300,000 and get an offer for $250,000, which you take to your first lender. Even if you jump through all their hoops, have a valid hardship, and get your short sale approved, that still leaves the second lender out in the cold, holding the bag to the tune of $100,000. The logical, and typical response from the second lender, will be to block the short sale any way they can.

2. Lack of buyers

Even in a perfect world where every lender agreed to take a loss and accept a short sale, there’s still one major flaw – we’re still in a recession, unemployment is at a multi-decade high and still rising, and consumer confidence is at an all time low. Add to that the fact that due to lack of liquidity and tightening of lending standards, many would be homebuyers are now ineligible for a mortgage anyway. Not exactly a formula for people rushing out to buy all these short sale properties, or to secure the funding to do so even if there were.

3. Bureaucracy & red tape by the banks

Have you ever tried to contact your bank for anything? Loan modification, find about or try to reverse a credit card fee, anything?

If so, you certainly know that it’s not the easiest task in the world. One department sends you over to another, who makes you repeat your info and your story. They tell you to fax in documents, then claim to never receive them. They say you’ll get a call back and you never do.

The point is that if the lender needs an excuse to postpone or make it  difficult for you to do anything, they have it… even if they have the best of intentions, the sheer volume of the requests for modifications, short sales, etc, has most lenders scrambling to play catch up.

Then there’s the fact that has squashed the hopes of so many short sellers in the past – even if you can get all the lenders and investors to agree on the short sale, that usually takes 3-6 months! By that time most qualified buyers have either found another home and lost interest in the current deal.

4. Lack of incentive & penalties

Just like the Federal Loan Modification program, this plan is lacking a huge ingredient… namely the lack of incentive for banks to take less than what they’re owed, and the lack of penalties for delaying or not complying with the rules of the program.

According to a NY Times article on Sunday, the program will offer $1000 apiece for 1st and 2nd mortgage holders, and $1500 for the seller.

Sure, there’s a $1,000 incentive payout for a bank to accept a short sale, that’s almost more of a slap in the face than anything. Actually, I’m kind of laughing out loud right now at the absurdity of this.  If someone owed you $100,000, and they came to you and said… “well I can only pay you $25,000, but  don’t worry, because my buddy here has another $1,000 for you…cool?” Haha… Does that really make anything better – it’s still only $26,000!!!

Or it looks more like this…

Borrower:  I know I owe you $100,000, but I can pay you $25,000… Is that ok?

Lender: No

Borrower: Ok, ok… well what if my friend uncle sam gives you $1,000 will that help?

Lender: Sure

I mean come on! Where do these smart people come up with these programs?

You really don’t need to incentivize the seller to sell – the fact that they are out of an underwater mortgage is incentive enough in most cases. The problem is, how can it possibly seem like a good idea for banks to take a $1000 consolation prize to take a loss of 5 or 6 figures on a deal?

Without a real, valuable incentive to accept short sale offers, and without a real penalty to lenders who don’t try to make things happen, there will be no real reason for lenders to go the extra mile to accept the short sales.

5. Lack of clear cut, uniform guidelines

Again, there is another huge comparison to be drawn with the federal loan modification program… the final decision is to be made at the sole discretion of the lender. One of the main reasons that the modification program failed is because you could submit the same application to 2 different lenders, or in some cases to 2 different people at the same lender, and receive 2 completely different answers.

Unless there is a uniform set of guidelines for acceptance, there is no way this will work.

Conclusion:

As with the loan modification program of a year ago, this program is destined for failure unless drastic changes are made to it by the government. By enacting these programs that are meant to be a show of the governments dedication to fixing the economy, but not including any real rules for banks to follow, they are delaying the inevitable, costing taxpayers billions more dollars, and making themselves look foolish and corrupt. Now is no time for token gestures, the economy is at the brink of collapse.

Either make changes that have some teeth and force the banks to start playing by some logical rules again, or do nothing, step back and let free market capitalism run its course. Let the market decide what the prices of homes should be, and who can qualify for them.

Sure there will be bank failures, foreclosures, and more pain, but most people who have an understanding of the economy, a few ounces of logic in their head, and don’t have a bank lobbyist at their doorstep daily, will tell you that this is bound to happen anyway. So isn’t it better to “rip the band aid off quickly”? Either let things take their course naturally, or to really take some action to change that course, instead of doing everything and anything, at all costs (literally) to keep playing by the bank’s rules, and stay on the same crash course that we’re currently on?

And then there’s the issue of the millions of people who are facing foreclosure. If they have tried everything possible to get a short sale done – jumped through all their banks hoops, found a buyer, did all the proper negotiation with all involved parties, and the banks still said no… then shouldn’t those people have the right to give the bank their home back with the same ramifications as if they did a short sale? It just seems very illogical to penalize a seller for circumstances that are far beyond their control, and very unproductive… why not penalize the banks who drag their feet and lose deals instead? You’d at least get some more short sales closed.

New York Times Reported on March 7, 2010:

But at the end of the day, the banks would rather make things difficult. According to J. K. Huey, a Wells Fargo vice president, said a short sale, like a loan modification, would have to meet the requirements of the investor who owns the loan.

“This is not an opportunity for the customer to just walk away,” Ms. Huey said. “If someone doesn’t come to us saying, ‘I’ve done everything I can, I used all my savings, I borrowed money and, by the way, I’m losing my job and moving to another city, and have all the documentation,’ we’re not going to do a short sale.”

Please comment below and let us know why you think this new program either will or won’t work. Thanks!

Related posts:

  1. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for lenders…
  2. Wachovia Short Sales Made Easy Jennifer Kelly with Wachovia Bank visited our Keller Williams Realty – Elk Grove office meeting today and gave us some…
  3. Obama’s Housing Shell Game; Short Sales and Relocation Assistance We’ve now come full circle. Instead of trying to get people to stay in their homes, Obama is willing to…

Tags: , , , , , , ,

REALTORS – forget “time to buy”, think “time to trade”

The “now is the time to buy” mantra has worn pretty thin over the last few years. With all the talk of foreclosures and shadow inventory, its a rallying cry that still rings hollow for many even though we currently have low interest rates, tax credits, and the lowest prices many areas have seen in years.

At the same time we’ve seen move-up buyers disappear from the market. Unwilling to sell because they think their house is worth more than they can currently get. And unwilling to buy because they fear prices might fall further. But reality is their house won’t rise in value while the one they want falls. And unlike the first time buyers and investors that this market has come to rely on, move-up buyers have the least to lose if the market did fall further… as their current home would fall in value in that event anyway.

In August 2009 the Federal Reserve approved an extension to the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), committing funds to support asset-backed securities through March 2010. In November 2009 the Federal Reserve announced they would not extend the TALF past March so we may find interest rates rising shortly. In addition, move-up buyers may also benefit from current housing tax credits that will also disappear in the months ahead.

So while I believe short-sales and REO’s will be with us for years to come, dont’ forget that two-thirds of homeowners in California still have equity, still have jobs, and may not be in the house of their dreams, the school district of their choice or as close to work as they’d like. There may be a short period of time, right now, where the rallying cry of “now is the time to trade” actually makes good sense. Don’t miss the window.

Related posts:

  1. For Those Considering a Short Sale If you are underwater on your home and are considering a short sale, the time to act is now. Today,…
  2. Government Housing Support Calculated Risk has an excellent breakdown of government programs to support housing. As everyone knows there has been a massive…
  3. Outlook for 2010 and beyond Given the depth of the Great Recession’s impact on the housing industry, most insiders are hoping for that long-awaited economic…

Tags: , , , , ,

Bankruptcy Is A Nuclear Strike On A Credit Score… Should You Push The Red Button?

Walkaway Consequences

buttonPlease consider: Snow Job: Strategic Defaults in an Era of Negative Equity

As more than a million people filing bankruptcy every year learn, life continues even after their credit scores are trashed. They can still buy cars on credit. They still have credit cards (secured) and debit cards. They can still rent apartments and houses.

Bankruptcy is a nuclear strike on a consumer’s credit score. Filing alone delivers a 355-365 point hit (out of top scores of around 800) and outright disqualification from obtaining any extension of credit from many lenders. The black mark follows the borrower for 10 years.

Short sales can trigger drops of 100-130 points; strategic defaults bring slightly heavier penalties, 100-150 points. The negative mark attaches to a credit record for seven years (but diminishes over time).

However, it’s possible to get a government loan only 3 years after foreclosure.

Ironically, late mortgage payments can have a bigger impact than outright default. FICO scores can easily plunge 200 points merely through nonpayment of a mortgage for a period of 60 to 90 days—something that lenders generally require of borrowers seeking loan modifications.

Credit recovery takes place remarkably quickly. Faced with the choice of foregoing credit card payments and incurring stress-related expenses stemming from high debt levels, the temporary black eye could be well worth it. Walkaways also join the crowd: Credit scores have been dropping steadily throughout the recession, especially for those with higher ratings.

Although for some people bankruptcy may be the best option, for most people facing mortgage problems, there is no reason to file bankruptcy.  If you isolate the foreclosure and keep everything else good on your credit, you will be on your way to financial recovery much quicker than one would expect.  Typically after 2 years things will start looking a lot better… credit score wise.  If you are considering bankruptcy, you may wanna re-think it and make sure that your problem doesn’t only revolve around the underwater mortgage.  You may be able to stay free in your home for 12 months and pay off all your other unsecured debt.  You definitely don’t need to nuke a problem that may only need a sniper.

Related posts:

  1. Credit Scores Heal, Your Savings Account Won’t! Fear of bad credit has homeowners paralyzed….
  2. How Do Employers Look At My Credit? Can Foreclosure Affect My Employment? Today on CNN they talked about these VERY interesting statistics. Here are the highlights below:    (full transcript) VELSHI: And…
  3. Strategic defaulters beware: banks coming after those with deficiency judgments Well this is interesting. Although we’ve been hearing over the last couple of years that lenders are too swamped with…

Tags: , , , , , , ,