Posts Tagged Short Sales

This Baby Giant Anteater at the Sacramento Zoo Looks Just Like an Alien

A couple of days ago, a baby giant anteater was born at the Sacramento Zoo in Land Park. This was a first for the Sacramento Zoo. I was mesmerized by the photo of the giant anteater and thought about going over to the Zoo to see if I could snap a photo. But the infant is confined to close quarters in a den with its mother, Amber, so the best that I can do is give you that link where you can see the actual photo for yourself.

The baby giant anteater looks just like an alien. And you know I’ve seen my fair share of aliens. So, I know exactly what they look like. Just kidding, I have no idea what an alien looks like, but if aliens were to come to Earth, I bet they would resemble giant anteaters. Neither the Sacramento Zoo’s website nor the Sacramento Bee article disclosed the gender of this newborn giant anteater. I wonder why.

I was thinking about this as I showed homes in Land Park yesterday. Did you know that a mother anteater is pregnant for 180 days? That’s as long as a listing agreement. Well, I do take one-year listing agreements, but those are generally short sales. My regular contract period for a traditional sale is 6 months. Not that it takes me 6 months to sell homes in Land Park, but it could take 45 days to get an offer, depending on the price range, and another 45 days to close. I am required to get a listing extension if closing runs over that time period, so being the efficient person that I am, I make my listing agreement durations longer than necessary to avoid additional paperwork.

It was cold yesterday, too. And wet. My feet were freezing. It was my own fault for not wearing boots and choosing ballerina flats instead. Two of the homes I showed had no heat. So, while my buyers were wandering around in the back yard in the rain, I grabbed a cellphone call. Sometimes I look at my phone when it rings to see who is calling, but I was too cold to take it out of its holster; I answered the call on my Bluetooth Jawbone.

The caller was a home seller in Iowa. She had been doing research online and said every website she went to led her back to me. That’s the downside of enjoying a strong Internet presence. Strangers from all over the country call me. This woman could not sell her home. Buyers had been telling her over and over that although they liked the home, the bedrooms were too small. What could she do to sell it?

I tried to explain that homes with undesirable features tend to sell for less than desirable homes. I asked her to think about why she bought the home in the first place because, whatever the reason, that’s why a buyer will purchase it now. I suggested she lower the price.

Turns out she built the home. Well, lady, I hate to say this, but you built your bedrooms too small.

Photo: Big Stock Photo

sacramento short sale agent

Elizabeth Weintraub is an author, home buying columnist for The New York Times-owned About.com, a Land Park resident, and a Land Park real estate agent who specializes in older, classic homes in Land Park, Curtis Park, Midtown and East Sacramento. Weintraub is also a Sacramento Short Sale agent who lists and successfully sells short sales throughout Sacramento. Call Elizabeth Weintraub at 916.233.6759. Put 35 years of real estate experience to work for you. DRE License # 00697006.

The Short Sale Savior, by Elizabeth Weintraub, available through bookstores everywhere and at Amazon.com.

Photo: Unless otherwise noted in this blog, the photo is copyrighted by Big Stock Photo and used with permission.

The views expressed herein are Weintraub’s personal views and do not reflect the views of Lyon Real Estate.

Related posts:

  1. How to Get an Edge Buying a Home in Land Park One of the many reasons that buyers for homes in Land Park like to work with a Land Park agent…
  2. The Best Day to Buy a Home is Just Around the Corner I was amazed yesterday when I called 2 agents on 2 listings and both agents answered their cell phones. Christmas…
  3. Be Prepared Before Putting Your Home on the Market in Land Park The year of 2010 is starting out very busy. I thought this weekend would be fairly quiet, but I guess…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Elk Grove Short Sale Successes!

Elk Grove Short Sales

So much is written about how difficult Short Sales are, that I thought it was time I told you a bit about our successes with Elk Grove Short Sales

Just this past week –
We closed 2 Elk Grove short sale listings…the bank on both was Aurora Bank. These properties were investment properties for the seller and were listed the first part of November 2009. We received approvals on them by mid January 2010, which means about 70 days on each. Then we had 30 days to get them closed…which we did this week! One was sold to an investor and the other to a first time homebuyer! Both buyers are very happy that they hung in there for the 100 days it took to get these properties closed….not bad. In a normal market, the marketing period is often times 90 days on a home before it goes pending…these 2 took about 1 week to actually have buyers in contract on them!

In addition, this week, we closed an escrow for an investor client on an Elk Grove Short Sale and got 2 more buyers into escrow on Elk Grove short sale listings! Not a bad week for short sales in the Elk Grove area! With this being the year of the Short Sale , it is important that we all learn how to navigate through them. The process is getting easier…the banks are starting to get with it more…agents and buyers are getting more educated on the process.

If you are a buyer, watch for more information on the Top 10 things you need to know about Short Sales, coming in the next couple of days. And in the meantime make sure to read, First Time Home Buyers Buying Elk Grove Short Sales!.

If you are a homeowner in distress and want more information on Elk Grove Short Sales, make sure to check out www.ElkGroveShortSale.com or contact us at (916) 230-0371 for a FREE private consulation.

Search All Elk Grove homes here

Lori Mode, Keller Williams Realty – Elk Grove
www.AllElkGroveHomes.com
Lori@ModeandDurhaM.com
(916) 230-0371

Related posts:

  1. Elk Grove Short Sales – is this the Market of the Moment We all know that the market of the moment is Distressed Properties, but with the inventory decreasing in the Elk…
  2. Short Sale approvals – 3 approved in 1 day! It’s great to wake up in the morning and realize all of your hard work really does pay off! Yesterday…
  3. Elk Grove Short Sales – Important questions answered Millions of struggling homeowners face uncertainty and do not know where to turn or what to do next for their…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Federal Short Sale Program… The Last Resort?

5 Reasons Why The Program Is Doomed To Fail:

Like the federal loan modification program that was put into effect just over a year ago, the federally subsidized short sale program, set to take effect April 5th, is now being touted as the next great hope for homeowners who either can’t afford to, or are choosing not to, pay their mortgages.

But, just like the Making Home Affordable program that released last year with the promise of saving millions of homes, the federal short sale program is drastically flawed, and if enacted, will more than likely end up with the same exact outcome… after many months and billions of wasted taxpayer dollars, the “experts” will be that it isn’t working for a variety of reasons.

In this Nostradamus like post, we’re going to examine why this new program is doomed to fail… do us a favor – bookmark it, and in a year come back and revisit it, and see how many of these predictions come true. Without further adieu, here are 5 reasons why a federal short sale program won’t work:

1. Second (and third) mortgage holders

Here’s a potential scenario: You owe $500,000 on your home, which was purchased in 2005 with an 80/20 loan, meaning your first loan was for $400,000 (80%) and the second loan is for $100,000 (20%). Due to the collapse of the housing market, the home is now worth $300,000. You put it on the market for $300,000 and get an offer for $250,000, which you take to your first lender. Even if you jump through all their hoops, have a valid hardship, and get your short sale approved, that still leaves the second lender out in the cold, holding the bag to the tune of $100,000. The logical, and typical response from the second lender, will be to block the short sale any way they can.

2. Lack of buyers

Even in a perfect world where every lender agreed to take a loss and accept a short sale, there’s still one major flaw – we’re still in a recession, unemployment is at a multi-decade high and still rising, and consumer confidence is at an all time low. Add to that the fact that due to lack of liquidity and tightening of lending standards, many would be homebuyers are now ineligible for a mortgage anyway. Not exactly a formula for people rushing out to buy all these short sale properties, or to secure the funding to do so even if there were.

3. Bureaucracy & red tape by the banks

Have you ever tried to contact your bank for anything? Loan modification, find about or try to reverse a credit card fee, anything?

If so, you certainly know that it’s not the easiest task in the world. One department sends you over to another, who makes you repeat your info and your story. They tell you to fax in documents, then claim to never receive them. They say you’ll get a call back and you never do.

The point is that if the lender needs an excuse to postpone or make it  difficult for you to do anything, they have it… even if they have the best of intentions, the sheer volume of the requests for modifications, short sales, etc, has most lenders scrambling to play catch up.

Then there’s the fact that has squashed the hopes of so many short sellers in the past – even if you can get all the lenders and investors to agree on the short sale, that usually takes 3-6 months! By that time most qualified buyers have either found another home and lost interest in the current deal.

4. Lack of incentive & penalties

Just like the Federal Loan Modification program, this plan is lacking a huge ingredient… namely the lack of incentive for banks to take less than what they’re owed, and the lack of penalties for delaying or not complying with the rules of the program.

According to a NY Times article on Sunday, the program will offer $1000 apiece for 1st and 2nd mortgage holders, and $1500 for the seller.

Sure, there’s a $1,000 incentive payout for a bank to accept a short sale, that’s almost more of a slap in the face than anything. Actually, I’m kind of laughing out loud right now at the absurdity of this.  If someone owed you $100,000, and they came to you and said… “well I can only pay you $25,000, but  don’t worry, because my buddy here has another $1,000 for you…cool?” Haha… Does that really make anything better – it’s still only $26,000!!!

Or it looks more like this…

Borrower:  I know I owe you $100,000, but I can pay you $25,000… Is that ok?

Lender: No

Borrower: Ok, ok… well what if my friend uncle sam gives you $1,000 will that help?

Lender: Sure

I mean come on! Where do these smart people come up with these programs?

You really don’t need to incentivize the seller to sell – the fact that they are out of an underwater mortgage is incentive enough in most cases. The problem is, how can it possibly seem like a good idea for banks to take a $1000 consolation prize to take a loss of 5 or 6 figures on a deal?

Without a real, valuable incentive to accept short sale offers, and without a real penalty to lenders who don’t try to make things happen, there will be no real reason for lenders to go the extra mile to accept the short sales.

5. Lack of clear cut, uniform guidelines

Again, there is another huge comparison to be drawn with the federal loan modification program… the final decision is to be made at the sole discretion of the lender. One of the main reasons that the modification program failed is because you could submit the same application to 2 different lenders, or in some cases to 2 different people at the same lender, and receive 2 completely different answers.

Unless there is a uniform set of guidelines for acceptance, there is no way this will work.

Conclusion:

As with the loan modification program of a year ago, this program is destined for failure unless drastic changes are made to it by the government. By enacting these programs that are meant to be a show of the governments dedication to fixing the economy, but not including any real rules for banks to follow, they are delaying the inevitable, costing taxpayers billions more dollars, and making themselves look foolish and corrupt. Now is no time for token gestures, the economy is at the brink of collapse.

Either make changes that have some teeth and force the banks to start playing by some logical rules again, or do nothing, step back and let free market capitalism run its course. Let the market decide what the prices of homes should be, and who can qualify for them.

Sure there will be bank failures, foreclosures, and more pain, but most people who have an understanding of the economy, a few ounces of logic in their head, and don’t have a bank lobbyist at their doorstep daily, will tell you that this is bound to happen anyway. So isn’t it better to “rip the band aid off quickly”? Either let things take their course naturally, or to really take some action to change that course, instead of doing everything and anything, at all costs (literally) to keep playing by the bank’s rules, and stay on the same crash course that we’re currently on?

And then there’s the issue of the millions of people who are facing foreclosure. If they have tried everything possible to get a short sale done – jumped through all their banks hoops, found a buyer, did all the proper negotiation with all involved parties, and the banks still said no… then shouldn’t those people have the right to give the bank their home back with the same ramifications as if they did a short sale? It just seems very illogical to penalize a seller for circumstances that are far beyond their control, and very unproductive… why not penalize the banks who drag their feet and lose deals instead? You’d at least get some more short sales closed.

New York Times Reported on March 7, 2010:

But at the end of the day, the banks would rather make things difficult. According to J. K. Huey, a Wells Fargo vice president, said a short sale, like a loan modification, would have to meet the requirements of the investor who owns the loan.

“This is not an opportunity for the customer to just walk away,” Ms. Huey said. “If someone doesn’t come to us saying, ‘I’ve done everything I can, I used all my savings, I borrowed money and, by the way, I’m losing my job and moving to another city, and have all the documentation,’ we’re not going to do a short sale.”

Please comment below and let us know why you think this new program either will or won’t work. Thanks!

Related posts:

  1. Obama’s standardized short-sale plan for short sales The U.S. Dept. of the Treasury recently announced the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA), which provides instructions for lenders…
  2. Wachovia Short Sales Made Easy Jennifer Kelly with Wachovia Bank visited our Keller Williams Realty – Elk Grove office meeting today and gave us some…
  3. Obama’s Housing Shell Game; Short Sales and Relocation Assistance We’ve now come full circle. Instead of trying to get people to stay in their homes, Obama is willing to…

Tags: , , , , , , ,

No BS Real Estate Indicators – January 2010

No BS Real Estate Indicators and Commentary – January 2010

The media said 2009 ended like a lamb.  The data was contradictory to that opinion.  No BS Real EstateDecember was a good month.  The media is also saying 2010 started like a lamb.    On this one, they are relatively correct.  Sales indeed showed a sharp decline in January (Sacramento single family homes; see Indicator #1 below).  As of right now, they are even lower in February.  Since March 2008, the number of closed sales has been consistenly over 1400 per month. 

The supply is limited to contingent short sales and REO fixers.  This is how booms start though.  Everything is quiet in the eye of the storm.  Spring has sprung and buyers are awakening.  If you are thinking of selling, get it on the market soon.  Call me for help.  If you are buying, yes, I can help you too. 

The charts below reflect over 10 years of local data collection, charting and trending.  The commentary is relevant to this information and what the author sees in the trenches.  No single piece of data can tell the whole story nor do these specific indicators predict the future. Remember, the “momentum” of a trend is important in understanding the force and direction of an underlying data element. A commodity trader watches momentum indicators to more accurately (but still with no guarantees) foretell a future data point. These are million-dollar decisions so momentum is important. 

The charting doesn’t end here.  Over 10 years of median sales price data has been collected and charted for over 40 local zip codes (see my Communities web page coming soon).  As you know, real estate is local and it’s hard to find data more granular than a zip code.  

Major Indicator #1 – Sales

Since April 2008 the momentum of Sales has been positive.  In January it crossed back into negative territory.  This would trigger a “SELL” action when a price is being charted.  In the case of this data element, it depicts the typical valley that “should” occur in a real estate cycle.  You can see the “winter dip” occur between December and February each year.  But things are thawing and bears are hungry.

Opinion:  Look for sales to decrease in February and then increase moderately through the spring and summer.  Nobody is sure what the rules will be and my bet is that Congress (should be written with a small “c” in Crayon font) will extend the tax credit for buyers, in some shape or form.  There are always hungry bears.

Major Indicator #2 – REO Sales

These are also known as “bank-owned” and “foreclosed” properties.  When auction demands are not met when offered on the courthouse steps, these homes revert to the owning/servicing bank to sell on the open market.  These have always occurred but not in the numbers we have seen since 2006. 

Since July 2009, REO sales have been less than half the number of Sales. The winter and spring before that, REOs were over 70% of the sales volume.  Banks are simply not foreclosing.  Whether due to accounting practices or “deer in the headlights” syndrome, the movement of product through the pipeline has stalled.  Now the supply is low except for contingent short sales.  And those can be a waste of time.  The momentum is negative.  We hope the REO Sales momentum increases — it would signify the availability of supply. 

Opinion:  Look for REO sales to stay low until the banks understand the new rules.  And then can understand the coming changes to those new rules.  

Major Indicator #3a – Median Sales Price (Sac Cnty)

The median price for all of Sacramento County has shown a slight improvement — but now retreating to the Summer 2001 price levels.  Momentum is serious about getting back to positive territory. 

Opinion:  The area price will decrease slightly while some high-priced areas/zipcodes will see a material reduction in comparable sales. 

Major Indicator #3b – Median Sales Price (ED Cnty)

The choppiness of this El Dorado County chart really just signifies the variation of homes, prices, and supply of sales comparables.  Even the momentum cannot decide which direction to go. 

Opinion:  This general price will decrease slightly due to the high-end which will experience most of the impact in 2010.

Major Indicator #3c – Median Sales Price (PL Cnty)

The slide of prices in Placer has been slower and smoother.  There also may be some corrupting forces at the County and City levels which we don’t see.  For some, the local pride is too sensitive and they won’t accept their just deserts.   Much of Whitney Ranch is entering the “short sale” zone.  This will help supply for some.

Opinion:  The price here will also decline to the squeeze at the higher end of home prices.

Major Indicator #3 – Median Sales Price (All)

This chart shows the comparison of the 3 counties.   It doesn’t include the momentum indicators but it’s interesting to see the responsiveness of Sacramento’s price changes compared to the other 2 counties.

Major Indicator #4 – Notices of Default (NODs)

Notices of Default have hit a major stoppage in the pipeline.  The indicator that is missing is “borrowers in distress”.  That would be a difficult piece of information to collect.

Opinion:  The number of NODs will increase as will Auctions and foreclosures.

Major Indicator #5 – New Home Permits

If they are still building, the homes are smaller and more sensibly designed.  Gone (temporarily?) are the massive walk-in closets and master bathrooms.  Gone are the 4-car garages and bonus rooms.  We have entered and exited the “McMansion Era”.  Some builders died before they could exit.

Opinion:  Population increases generally require more housing.  It only seems we have enough. 

Major Indicator #6 – Mortgage Rate

Free money!!!  If you can get a loan, don’t miss this window of opportunity.  But rules have changed so you better know your buying power and options.

Opinion:  Rates will increase slightly over the year although other lending restrictions will corrupt the market making the rate change less important.  This cannot last for much longer.  China will inevitably call us on it.

Major Indicator #7 – Inventory

I’ve added another piece of information to this chart:  “Active Short Contingent” properties are akin to a Pending status with regard to how Realtors treat them.   If it’s “contingent”, Realtors and buyers know the home has a soft deal with a prospective purchaser.  I think MetroList should make it a “Pending Contingent” status.  It will make the numbers stop lying. 

Opinion:  Inventory will increase but so will Active Short Contingent listings.  So who knows!

Major Indicator #8 – Months’ Inventory

The Inventory is over-stated so the true turn-over rate (Months’ Inventory) is a little different than depicted below.  Since this depicts the months required to sell all inventory (at the average Days on Market), this too is over-stated.  Mitigating that variance is the fact that many of these “active” listings are actually “pending contingent” and can remain on the market for many months without a bank approval or change in status.  In other words, this indicator is low but not necessarily 3.3 months.

Opinion:  See opinion on “7 – Inventory” above.

Major Indicator #9 – Short Sales

This is a new indicator showing how many Short Sales were successfully closed.  The momentum cannot be charted until at least 12 months of raw data have been collected. 

Opinion:  This number will stay relatively flat, with a slight increase.  Many banks have already concluded they will not entertain short sale offers.  Some borrowers purchased mortgage insurance with their loans which means the lender doesn’t care if they foreclose (insurance pays them about 80% of loan value). 

Major Indicator #10 – Swing Indicator

This is my favorite indicator since it shows the oscillation of the market — much like a EKG machine.  Let’s hope the market doesn’t flatline.  Except for January ‘09, Up-Ticks outpaced Down-Ticks.  For this last month, 41 zipcodes had a momentum up-tick. 

Opinion:  The up-ticks will retreat to a lower level.  This is a cycle that we cannot and should not fight.

These charts depict the momentum of changes in the underlying raw data to help forecast direction. These are not a guarantee of future direction but aid in the prediction of cause/affect in the various market forces. No single indicator tells the whole story. Also charted is the raw data itself. For an explanation or for a monthly subscription to this periodic report, call or email Jay Emerson (916-517-9606, Jay@JayEmerson.com). The data is deemed reliable but not guaranteed. Sources include DataQuick, CBIA, Sac MetroList, and other public information.

Contact me for more details and to get an edge in real estate!

Jay Emerson, DRE Broker #01788488
Realty Executives Galster Group
5006 Sunrise Blvd, Ste 202
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
(916) 517-9606
Fax (916) 966-8706

Related posts:

  1. No BS Real Estate Indicators 2009 12 The [local real estate] year in review……
  2. Sacramento County Housing Statistics for January 2010   January shows decreased activity, median price remains higher than year ago A seasonally normal decrease in home sales…
  3. Sacramento 95826 Sales Data – January 2010 (Rosemont, College Greens/Glenbrook) Here is sales data information for that area for closed sales in January 2010: All of the 95826: 19  Sold…

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,